Bioretention Field Performance Comparison

I performed a field-scale assessment of the water quality and hydrology of a conventionally-designed bioretention cell over two periods, 4 years apart. In this study, we found that high hydrologic and contaminant mass removal was maintained over the life of the bioretention cell, but that concentration data at the bioretention underdrain revealed poor to moderate treatment performance. If we wanted to improve the removal of dissolved pollutant concentrations in the outlet, we would require more targeted design such as media amendments or hydraulic controls. There were differences in treatment performance between the two monitoring periods, mainly due to the settling of bioretention media, showing that monitoring more than 2 years a post-construction will give a more reliable treatment performance evaluation.

A manuscript for this project was submitted for journal publication and is currently undergoing review.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s